Tuesday, June 2, 2015

Dr. Martin Feldman, MD, well known New York HIV dissident physician, dies

Dr. Martin Feldman, MD, a well known New York HIV dissident physician, apparently died late last year.

I found out when I tried to make an appointment for a friend of mine a few months ago. The answering service operator told me that Dr. Feldman had died and that his office had been closed, so apparently he died and no one is taking over his practice. There are others who commented on the internet that they too learned of Dr. Feldman's death only after trying to contact his office for an appointment. I hope that there is an explanation for this apparent secrecy, but I find it puzzling, if not troubling.I heard no notice of the death of this public figure. I have searched and searched, and even now, months later, I can find no published notice of his death on the internet, and no obituary. The apparent secrecy surrounding the death of this public figure concerns me, and I hope it will be explained at some point.

Many doctors know the truth about HIV/AIDS. They know that HIV has never been proven to exist, that it has never been proven to be transmissible or to cause any disease, and that the so-called "HIV tests" have never been validated and therefore are used inappropriately, if not fraudulently.

But they are afraid to challenge their controllers, The American Medical Association, and the Pharmaceutical companies that provide funding for just about everything that will advance their agenda and boost their bottom line, and pull the plug on anything and anyone who threatens their multi-billion dollar profits.

Dr. Feldman dared to speak the truth publicly. More doctors need to find the strength to follow his example. RIP.


Quotes by and about Dr. Martin Feldman, M.D. :

“[Gary] Null and co-author James Feast do us a service in giving voice to the point of view of AIDS dissidents such as Nobel laureates Drs. Mullis and Gilbert, as well as Professors Strohman and Rasnick, and the many others cited in the book [AIDS: A Second Opinion]. One has to wonder, why hasn’t their collective challenge to the ‘HIV equals AIDS equals death’ paradigm been given more publicity? These are credentialed people, and there certainly is, as this book shows, reasonableness to their claims.”
“I myself have had three patients with advanced AIDS and substantially debilitated health who then undertook various natural protocols and improved their overall immune function significantly. So why wouldn’t I want to explore alternative approaches to this condition? Why wouldn’t I want to review as many scientific references as possible that support these approaches? I am happy to have a book on hand that goes beyond the party line of those who run the war on AIDS, looks at alternative perspectives, and provides extensive documentation to support them.
“Furthermore, I plan to make this book required reading for all of the persons I counsel with AIDS-defining illnesses. And I would recommend it to every concerned and conscientious physician, nurse, and public health advocate in the country.”
Review of “Aids, A Second Opinion,” Amazon.com, June 18, 2002
— Dr. Martin Feldman, MD, Assistant Clinical Professor of Neurology at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, graduate of Columbia University’s College of Physicians and Surgeons, author of more than 50 articles published in peer-reviewed medical journals

"The current drugs on the market, primarily AZT, tend to severely weaken the immunity and make the body have to work harder to have immune strength. the body uses up its basic nutrients in the process. Really, the body is fighting against the AZT." --Martin Feldman, as quoted in the book, Get Healthy Now!: A Complete Guide to Prevention, Treatment and Healthy Living, by Gary Null. 
Selected Publications:
Vaccination: An Updated Analysis of the Health Risks
by Gary Null, PhD, and Martin Feldman, MD


Death by Medicine By Gary Null, Ph.D., PhD; Carolyn Dean MD, ND; Martin Feldman, MD; Debora Rasio, MD; and Dorothy Smith, PhD


Dr. Martin Feldman, M.D. and Gary Null on television in 1985, talking about cholesterol:

Monday, May 4, 2015

What does "HIV Positive" really mean?

Can a diagnosis be wrong? Yes.

Can a diagnosis be inaccurate? Yes.

Can a diagnosis be based on a test that is not proven to be valid for making such a diagnosis? Yes.

That is the case with HIV/ADS. So if you tell me that you "tested positive," does that mean that you tested positive for "HIV"? No. That it mean that you are infected with HIV? No. That is what you are led to believe, but it is not true.

If someone tests "positive" it means they had reactive antibodies to the protein used in the test. This protein is ASSUMED but NOT PROVEN to come from a hypothetical "virus" that has never been purified, never proven to cause any disease, and in fact never proven to exist as defined, but nevertheless this imaginary virus has a name and it's called HIV. Now HIV stands for "Human Immunodeficiency Virus" but the virus was named without first proving that it deserved such a name! Because there exists no virus that has been proven to cause immunodeficiency whose characteristics match those of what is called AIDS, Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome.

THE CONNECTION OF REACTIVE ANTIBODIES IN YOUR BLOOD TO A DIAGNOSIS OF HIV INFECTION DEFIES SCIENCE. But it fools a lot of people.

Be smart. Don't let it fool you.

Even if : 1) HIV someday was proven to exist, and then
2) HIV was proven to cause AIDS, and then
3) the proteins used in the "HIV test" were PROVEN to come from "HIV" and be unique to HIV, STILL THEN the test would prove only that you had antibodies and were exposed to HIV, but it STILL WOULD NOT PROVE that you have an ACTIVE infection to anything!

A test that has been validated by the three criteria just mentioned does not exist today, but if it did, a positive result would indicate only that your body made antibodies to this foreign invader, such as a virus, and that these antibodies most likely destroyed that virus. Antibodies are not a sign of active infection; antibodies are a sign of your body's conquest of an infection.

If you understand this, based on classic immunology, you will understand how very distant a "positive" test result is from the resulting highly speculative "diagnosis" of so-called "HIV" infection that doctors announce to their patients today and that generates billions in profits at the expense of people's health and survival.

After 30 years, the claim of "HIV+" can be supported only by fake science that contradicts valid science. Don't take my word for it. Study basic microbiology, basic immunology, and the history of HIV/AIDS research.

Read all of the entries in our continually developing blog, which is far from complete.


Richard Jannaccio   May 4, 2015.   Copyright by RICHARD JANNACCIO

Tuesday, March 31, 2015

What Is A Good Strategy For Discontinuing Use Of ARVs?

Strategies For Discontinuing ARVs

The HIV/AIDS industry is not interested in funding research on how to safely discontinue use of ARVs, because they want you to continue to use their toxic drugs for the rest of your life.

Therefore, in the absence of such research, the best we can do is to piece together facts and observations that have been made, develop an understanding of what happens when you stop using ARVs, and develop a strategy that is based on that knowledge.

Let's start by considering these four (4) facts:

1. Many people have stopped using ARVs abruptly, with no reported adverse effects. In the early years of the "epidemic," many patients who could no longer tolerate the drugs were told by their doctor to stop taking them, and took no medication until the next, newest drug was ready to be marketed. No reports were found of adverse reactions from stopping the drugs abruptly when it was necessary and ordered by a doctor. But if you decide to stop taking ARVs without the doctor's approval, then they say you are in great danger. What is this "great danger"? Will you get sick and die? Many have quit ARVs and appeasr to be healthier for having done so. If you demand only "real" effects, you will be told that if you discontinue ARVs, your CD4 count will go down and your "viral load" will go up. But many people are healthy despite test results that are deemed to be dire, without sufficient scientific grounding or proof to support the interpretation of such test results. Moreover, many have regained health after detoxifying and rebuilding by adhering to a healthy lifestyle.

http://www.aidsinfonet.org/fact_sheets/view/406

2. Some people have developed life-threatening conditions after discontinuing use of ARVs. Those conditions may be due to the prior use of ARVs rather than due to withdrawal. Indeed, many people stop taking ARVs when they notice that they cannot tolerate any more damage to their health, but by then, the damage may be extensive and it may be too late, especially if they merely stop taking the drugs but do not also take strong measures to promote detoxification and healing.


http://hivinsite.ucsf.edu/InSite?page=ar-05-01

http://www.aidsmeds.com/articles/Hepatotoxicity_4863.shtml

http://www.aafp.org/afp/2011/0615/p1456.html

https://www.aids.gov/hiv-aids-basics/staying-healthy-with-hiv-aids/potential-related-health-problems/kidney-disease/

http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/30/Supplement_2/S96.full

http://www.aidsbeacon.com/news/2011/05/05/nerve-damage-is-still-a-common-complication-in-people-with-hiv-aids/

http://www.hiv.va.gov/provider/manual-primary-care/peripheral-neuropathy.asp

3. ARVS damage the immune system and are associated with an immune system dysfunction known as Immune Reconstitution Syndrome. Discontinuing use of ARVs after these toxic drugs have weakened and altered the immune system and killed normal nonpathogenic microbes could leave you vulnerable. The solution is not to keep taking the ARVs, but rather to rebuild the immune system and use probiotics to replace the "good" bacteria.

http://medind.nic.in/iae/t05/i4/iaet05i4p299.pdf

4. The psychotropic effects of ARVs could produce serious central-nervous-system withdrawal symptoms (mental illness) if discontinued abruptly. This could have serious, even fatal consequences, such as suicide. Check the ingredients of ARVs. Efavirenz, or EFV, is the drug most often associated with psychiatric symptoms.

http://aidsinfo.nih.gov/guidelines/html/1/adult-and-adolescent-arv-guidelines/31/adverse-effects-of-arv

http://www.natap.org/2002/june/060702_2.htm

http://depts.washington.edu/madclin/providers/guidelines/pdf/efavirenz_psych.pdf

Given these facts, if I had been taking ARVs and wished to stop taking them, I would either:

1) attempt to quit ARVs "cold turkey" and resume taking them if any symptoms develop, and then reduce use gradually over several weeks, or

2)  just reduce gradually over a 4 to 8 week period without trying to quit abruptly.

In either case, I would fortify my body with nutrients, exercise, sufficient quality sleep and start a healthy lifestyle to help my body detoxify and heal the damage that was done by these toxic chemicals. These additional lifestyle changes include avoiding stress, drinking plenty of unpolluted/properly treated water, and avoiding all drugs, alcohol, and junk food.

PLEASE DONATE TO SUPPORT OUR WORK SO THAT WE CAN CONTINUE TO DO MORE.  Please use the "DONATE" Button located upper right.
                               *****  THANK YOU!! *****  1LOVE!!!