23. The Exposed Agenda & Adverse Effects Of HIV "Positive" Invalid Test Results

Q&A

AL writes: "I am from Johannesburg South Africa, and if a person only realize how lonely life is without love; when people find out you are HIV+, then they push you away. Hoax or not, why are people so evil?"

People are not all evil, AL, but they may act that way out of ignorance and fear.

HIV is a lie that would die, without ignorance and fear.

So the media, controlled by information fed to them by "experts" on the corporate payroll, together with government-sponsored campaigns, put out a unified message to accomplish their goal, using fear to get people to "get tested and know your status."

Think of the test as a way to trap people who test positive. Eventually, they want to get people to take drugs for the rest of their lives, because that's the business that feeds their greed and makes them rich. Test results are very effective in accomplishing this goal. You can't argue with a test result ... unless you learn how the tests work!

The tests are there to convince you that you are infected and will die unless you take drugs for the rest of your life. Telling people that they are positive is disguised as a diagnosis, but it is really their sales pitch for ARVs, Anti-RetroViral drugs, also called ART, Anti-Retroviral Therapy.

Behold how effectively that scam works!

They tell people that there is a deadly virus, and you can get it from sex. Neither is proven after 30 years!

They tell people that they have a test, and if you test positive, you are infected with this deadly virus.

The tests do not test for virus. They test for antibodies -- which everybody has. But only if your antibodies are above a certain level and react with proteins in their test, then you are diagnosed "positive" for HIV.

There is no scientific validity to do so, but who knows enough to challenge them? The members of this group who study and read the research know.

We know that if they had to prove it, they could never find "HIV" in your body and prove it. They have not even proven that their test has any validity, or, for that matter, that HIV even exists.

Until recently, package inserts stated that the test was not approved to be used to diagnose, although that is exactly how it was used. Such unapproved use is legal and is called "off-label" use.

That inappropriate "off-label' use went on for many, many years. But to produce an HIV test for home use by individuals, the package inserts had to change. First, they could have people reading that they had just purchased a test kit that was not valid for detecting HIV infection, because that's why they bought it. Second, only doctors are legally permitted to engage in "off-label" use. Manufacturers would be breaking the law if they actually marketed their product for such use.

The industry wanted to have the approved use of the test modified and the package inserts changed so that they could market home rapid test kits. Not surprisingly, they got what they wanted.

The industry now is no longer required to use such plain and direct language in their test package inserts. Now they talk about "algorithms." Doesn't that sound high tech? But what it boils down to is flawed logic that says that if two or more invalid results agree, then that adds up to a valid result.

They are confusing reliability and validity. If test results are reproducible, it means the test is reliable. In the case of the HIV test, for an individual, the test may or may not be reliable (reproducible results), but if reliable, it may very likely be reliably invalid (false positive).

Validity has to be proven, and in the case of the so-called "HIV tests," after more than 30 years, such proof still has not been produced for the test itself, much less for any individual results.

They tell people that there is a deadly virus, and you can get it from sex or sharing needles. Neither is proven after more than 30 years. If it was real, it shouldn't be so hard. Many other microbes have been shown to cause disease and be transmissible by various means, including exchanges of body fluids during sex or sharing of needles.

But if you hear the unproven propaganda over and over,  you hear when the media say it, the government says it, your doctor says it, and everybody says it, then it must be true, right?

Not for those of us who have closely examined the research and the history of HIV-AIDS.

But many people believe it, and then they are so fearful that they add even more caution to protect themselves from a threat that cannot be proven to be the real cause of any illness or disease. The diseases are real, but the assigned cause is not supported by convincing scientific research results. People are brainwashed. They are ignorant of the truth, and they fear what they do not know.

I wouldn't call all of those people evil, at least not inherently evil. I call those who made them that way evil. Those who use fear and fraud to make other people act evil are evil. Evil, sinister, and greedy. Greed is their motive, and greed is the true plague that needs to be dealt with.

Deal with greed, spread the resources of our planet Earth fairly, and watch how healthy we all can be --physically, emotionally, and spiritually!

If, for some reason, you are required to get tested, have your doctor first sign the attached Certificate of Accuracy.
http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/data2/testcert.htm

PLEASE DONATE WHAT YOU CAN TO SUPPORT THE CONTINUATION OF OUR WORK. THE "DONATE" BUTTON IS IN THE RIGHT COLUMN OF THIS PAGE. THANKS! 1Love!!

join us on Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/groups/HIV.AIDS.Alterntives/